[Standards] <[CDATA[ in XMPP

Tobias S. Josefowitz t.josefowitz at gmail.com
Mon Jul 30 23:43:36 UTC 2007

On 7/31/07, Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com> wrote:

> Not that I disagree that XMPP should be defined as a rational subset
> of XML, rather than including the whole spec, but... this seems to be
> needlessly splitting hairs, to me.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the definition of XMPP is that you /
> restart the stream/ when you get an opening <stream> element (such as
> after starttls or whatever).  Given that the stream starts over with
> the new <stream>, the complete XML stream is indeed still a complete
> and valid document.

If seen that way, XMPP should probably define that universal peace
ensues upon <starttls/>.


More information about the Standards mailing list