[Standards] <[CDATA[ in XMPP
sgolovan at nes.ru
Tue Jul 31 13:22:50 UTC 2007
On 7/31/07, Mickaël Rémond <mickael.remond at process-one.net> wrote:
> Le 31 juil. 07 à 13:58, Mridul a écrit :
>> Not sure where the confusion was ... I always assumed that support for
>> CDATA was a given since it is just another xml construct.
> So am I. I have been surprise by the heated debate :)
The main mistake you did (and probably the only mistake, because CDATA
is indeed a valid XML construct) is that you BREAK THINGS.
Since NO software used CDATA before there's certainly some which will break.
I don't know about others but personally I don't like uncertainty and
I don't like to search over the software after upgrade to find why it
I would say that ejabberd is not a tool to convince (force?) people to
use clients/servers with full XML parser. Developing it one must try
to keep it compatible with clients and not break them.
More information about the Standards