[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: MUC Auto-Join
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Jun 4 16:57:07 UTC 2007
Ian Paterson wrote:
> Do we really need presence-triggered invitations?
I don't know. I figured I'd write up the idea so that some enterprising
developers could code it up and see if it's a good idea.
> 1. Room presence publishes the room capabilities
Presence good. We've got it, why not use it?
> 2. The user knows whether room is online or not
I don't think that's compelling, it's just a byproduct of sharing
presence. But enabling the room to know when the user is offline may be
more useful (though we already have that via directed presence).
> 3. The auto-invite works with existing clients - and will therefore be
> deployed more quickly
It's easier to deploy a new version of a MUC component than to deploy
thousands of new clients.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards