[Standards] compliance: RFCs or bis drafts?

Michal 'vorner' Vaner vorner at ucw.cz
Thu Jun 14 19:37:24 UTC 2007


On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:44:50PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>  In today's meeting of the XMPP Council we discussed whether the 
>  specifications we will use for the 2008 certification program (i.e., XEPs 
>  211 and 212) should refer to rfc3920bis and rfc3921bis (the in-progress 
>  revisions to RFCs 3920 and 3921, a.k.a. "the bis drafts"). Here is my take:

How much additional work would it be to test both and say "It complies
to this one, but not this one"?

BOFH Excuse #452:
Somebody ran the operating system through a spelling checker.

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070614/9e4e9473/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list