[Standards] XEP-0154 and XEP-0084
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Jun 18 18:15:03 UTC 2007
Andreas Monitzer wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 18:23, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> I've implemented it. It works pretty well, and I haven't had any
>>> issues, except that specifying the width and height isn't that easy
>>> for a client (I actually had write a parser for png headers for
>>> this). Maybe these two could be made optional?
>> How about recommended (SHOULD include)? :)
> That's fine for me :)
Done in version 0.10 :)
I'll probably request a Last Call on XEP-0084 at the next Council meeting.
>>> Usually, clients don't need instant notification for changes to the
>>> profile, that's why it's not really absolutely necessary to use PEP
>>> there. Of course, it'd simplify server implementations, so it's
>>> definitely something to look into.
>> Yes, there is that issue, too -- do people need notifications about
>> profiles or is that data more static? If static, why use PEP?
> Well, you wouldn't need any special cases for vCards on the server any
> more. Just implement PEP, and you're done for 90% of the non-messaging
> stuff used for IM.
> If the client doesn't announce that it'd like to get notified of changes
> to that PEP node, it wouldn't receive unnecessary data, but could still
> request the info explicitly, which is right how vCards work right now.
Right, that's the appeal.
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards