[Standards] Re: Jingle bootstrapping

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Mar 5 23:35:40 UTC 2007

Alexander Gnauck wrote:
> Thiago Camargo schrieb:
>> If we want to stay using pure STUN and pure ICE solutions, I can't see 
>> any reasons to use jingle instead of SIP.
>> Let's use our community to build the best solution for Multimedia 
>> Signaling and Negotiation. Let's build something new and better then 
>> what we already have today
>> Let's show why XMPP + Jingle could be the next Signaling protocol.
> the problem is to pass NAT and firewalls. Currently it looks like STUN 
> and ICE the best protocols out there. The problem is that they are 
> complex, and no ICE libraries are available yet.

They are in the works (Telepathy etc.).

> We also discussed this in detail on the DevCon in Brussels. Our 
> conclusion was that we should evaluate all possibilities out there, and 
> also take a closer look at Teredo.

Agreed. Thankfully Jingle provides a modular approach so we can plug in 
many different kinds of transports and see what works best.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070305/0f55fa83/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list