[Standards] Re: Jingle bootstrapping
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Mar 5 23:35:40 UTC 2007
Alexander Gnauck wrote:
> Thiago Camargo schrieb:
>> If we want to stay using pure STUN and pure ICE solutions, I can't see
>> any reasons to use jingle instead of SIP.
>> Let's use our community to build the best solution for Multimedia
>> Signaling and Negotiation. Let's build something new and better then
>> what we already have today
>> Let's show why XMPP + Jingle could be the next Signaling protocol.
> the problem is to pass NAT and firewalls. Currently it looks like STUN
> and ICE the best protocols out there. The problem is that they are
> complex, and no ICE libraries are available yet.
They are in the works (Telepathy etc.).
> We also discussed this in detail on the DevCon in Brussels. Our
> conclusion was that we should evaluate all possibilities out there, and
> also take a closer look at Teredo.
Agreed. Thankfully Jingle provides a modular approach so we can plug in
many different kinds of transports and see what works best.
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards