[Standards] Namespace Priority

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Mar 6 18:37:17 UTC 2007

Ian Paterson wrote:

[philosophical stuff removed for now...]

> There seems to be a real need. We've already got servers like Tigase 
> implementing proprietary functionality. Shouldn't we at least 
> standardise something? Why shouldn't we define a protocol (perhaps 
> something like this: 
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2007-February/014000.html) to 
> enable those applications that want to support specialized content routing?

Can't the server already figure that out based on RAP? It could use the 
RAP info for routing stanzas sent the bare JID even in cases where the 
contact does not receive the user's presence. But it's not clear how 
that applies to IQs, if at all.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070306/edba90c9/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list