[Standards] Namespace Priority

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Mar 6 18:52:46 UTC 2007

Nolan Eakins wrote:
> Ian Paterson wrote:
>> Clearly we should enable users that want to, to block calls from
>> non-contacts. But why should other people not be able to use Jingle to
>> receive calls from anyone in the world?
>> Once again, I agree that we should use presence whenever possible. We
>> should exploit the advantage to the full. However, I don't think we
>> should let it become a handicap. IMO we should not restrict all
>> specialized applications to working only between contacts.
> I agree. Non-contacts should be able to request a voice or whatever
> session with me. My decline may need to be silent if I don't want them
> to know if I'm online though. An example I can think of is adding voice
> to these live support services. Clearly I don't want my customers to be
> forced to request presence from the live support service just to
> troubleshoot some problem they're having. That also pollutes their
> roster with one off contacts as well.

Negotiate a chat session via XEP-0155 to request an audience, when it 
starts exchange directed presence, then do your IQ stuff for Jingle. 
Seems straightforward to me.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070306/3f1e0f48/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list