[Standards] Do we need STUN?

Thomas Charron twaffle at gmail.com
Thu Mar 8 19:25:09 UTC 2007

On 3/8/07, Thiago Camargo <thiago at jivesoftware.com> wrote:
> You're completely right. But why clients need to implements STUN? Why? If sometimes it's not necessary?

  Because the majority of the world isn't behind a corp firewall.  The
majority of the world is behind a simple NAT Linksys box in which STUN
solves the problem, easily, in fact.

-- Thomas

More information about the Standards mailing list