[Standards] Do we need STUN?

Dafydd Harries dafydd.harries at collabora.co.uk
Thu Mar 8 23:08:51 UTC 2007

Ar 08/03/2007 am 09:44, ysgrifennodd Sean Egan:
> On 3/8/07, Evgeniy Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >Do we really need a STUN support in Jingle implementations?
> Yes.

It's worth remembering that you only need STUN/ICE if you're implementing the
Jingle ICE transport (XEP 176). If you're developing a Jingle implementation,
you can start off with the simpler Jingle Raw UDP transport (XEP 177). Of
course, if you want reliable NAT traversal, you'll need ICE sooner or later.


More information about the Standards mailing list