[Standards] Do we need STUN?

Евгений Храмцов xramtsov at gmail.com
Sat Mar 10 03:30:55 UTC 2007

2007/3/9, Sean Egan <seanegan at gmail.com>:
> I honestly don't know what motivated the design of their packet
> format, but hopefully you see the irony in your complaint. ;)

So I do. But the irony is in fact that STUN developers can re-invent the
wheel, but we can not.

What are the problems you have with it?

I have the problems in the _begining_ of the document. If I see the bicycle
with square wheels on the first pages on the protocol description, I have
absolutely no motivation to implement it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070310/b2572bc8/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list