[Standards] Do we need STUN?
xramtsov at gmail.com
Sat Mar 10 03:30:55 UTC 2007
2007/3/9, Sean Egan <seanegan at gmail.com>:
> I honestly don't know what motivated the design of their packet
> format, but hopefully you see the irony in your complaint. ;)
So I do. But the irony is in fact that STUN developers can re-invent the
wheel, but we can not.
What are the problems you have with it?
I have the problems in the _begining_ of the document. If I see the bicycle
with square wheels on the first pages on the protocol description, I have
absolutely no motivation to implement it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards