[Standards] Link-Local Messaging comments
sjoerd at luon.net
Wed Mar 14 09:17:16 UTC 2007
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:00:10AM +0100, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> Dnia 13-03-2007, wto o godzinie 23:14 +0100, Sjoerd Simons napisa??(a):
> > > Like s2s, Link-local simply links
> > > two systems, and identification of accounts is better placed in the
> > > stanzas
> > > themselves (which allows multiplexing of one TCP connection for many
> > > stanza
> > > senders/receivers).
> > In practice each contact on a machine is from a different user, each
> > running
> > their own client..
> Not completely true with Telepathy ( http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/ )
> that interconnects desktops not users (clients).
Usually only one desktop belongs to one user :) And each desktop is only only
connected with one contact to link-local, so the argument still holds.
But actually in telepathy speak, i'm referring to the connection-manager when
talking about the client here. Not all the magic above it :)
Wisdom is knowing what to do with what you know.
-- J. Winter Smith
More information about the Standards