[Standards] certification etc.

Matt Tucker matt at jivesoftware.com
Sat Mar 17 02:36:34 UTC 2007


Peter,

Yep, stream compression isn't a bad one to include. Also, an advanced
suite is a great idea -- it's key to have stretch goals. :)

-Matt 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org 
> [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:16 PM
> To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Standards] certification etc.
> 
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> >> XEP-0073: Basic IM Protocol Suite
> >>           http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0073.html
> > 
> > Basic seems fine to me now. But we'll need to think about how Basic 
> > interacts with the RFC revisions, which won't be published 
> by the end 
> > of June.
> 
> Looking at the Draft and Final XEPs, I think we may want to 
> make stream compression (XEP-0138) recommended. Thoughts?
> 
> /psa
> 
> 



More information about the Standards mailing list