[Standards] Do we need STUN?
stpeter at jabber.org
Sat Mar 17 03:26:21 UTC 2007
Sorry, got behind on mail, just catching up.
Sean Egan wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Evgeniy Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2) Lack of integration with XMPP services.
>> I don't see any methods how to authenticate XMPP-users on the STUN/TURN
> Right now XEP 176 (The ICE transport) says you should use disco to
> locate a STUN server to use. Because you often need more than just a
> single STUN server to get through NATs and firewalls, Google Talk uses
> a simple "get" protocol to locate a STUN server, relay servers, and
> relay server authentication:
Yes, as previously discussed, we need to formalize something like that.
Somehow it slipped my mind over the last few weeks of travel...
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards