[Standards] Do we need STUN?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Sat Mar 17 03:30:38 UTC 2007


Rachel Blackman wrote:

> I'm more concerned, personally, about a) what happens with S5B with the 
> other stream system providing a new second incompatible file-transfer 
> system, and b) if we do deprecate S5B in favor of just Jingle for all 
> streaming, how do we handle the transition in a clean manner to avoid 
> horrible incompatible-file-transfer issues all over?

Well, I *did* start to work on an S5B transport for Jingle:

http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-bytestreams.html

That might ease the transition somewhat.

Now if only I would push out a new release of proxy65, eh?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070316/aaffba18/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list