[Standards] Entity Capabilities Woes
daniel at noll.id.au
Sat Mar 17 12:03:28 UTC 2007
On Saturday 17 March 2007 22:19, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Really, i think that XEP-0115 is good, I think that you just fail to
> understand the exact meaning of the ext attribute.
> let's quote the XEP (§4.1)
> | The names of the feature bundles MUST NOT be used for semantic purposes:
> | they are merely identifiers that will be used in other use cases.
Nope, actually I understood that. I got tripped up by the fact they they DO
have semantics, being that they don't change between versions of the same
client. Originally I would have expected something like a "ftrans" extension
to add extra features over time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards