[Standards] certification etc.
pendleto at movsoftware.com
Tue Mar 20 14:52:23 UTC 2007
Stream compression for clients or servers? I just want to throw in an
opinion that we don't want to load too many requirements or recommendations
into the "Basic IM" suite since mobile clients really don't need (or can't
handle due to environmental constraints) lots of features. I think
compression is a nice to have feature, but not a basic one.
I think the current list in XEP-0073 is reasonable though as long as
"recommended" doesn't become "required in order to get a link on xmpp.com".
From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:16 PM
To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Standards] certification etc.
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> XEP-0073: Basic IM Protocol Suite
> Basic seems fine to me now. But we'll need to think about how Basic
> interacts with the RFC revisions, which won't be published by the end of
Looking at the Draft and Final XEPs, I think we may want to make stream
compression (XEP-0138) recommended. Thoughts?
More information about the Standards