[Standards] certification etc.

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Mar 22 05:36:28 UTC 2007

JD Conley wrote:

> I was also wondering about XEP-0077. In the current Basic profile
> it's recommended, which is fine. But I am seeing these examples on
> the list with it changing to REQUIRED. IBR is interesting, but it
> seems people use XMPP for the most part in the enterprise with
> central administration or a hosted service where they don't want
> people creating accounts through an automated fashion on their
> standard c2s ports. Though we obviously have this implemented already
> we'll probably be making it much less accesible in our client
> software (and only if the server sends out the stream feature).
> Anyway, I vote for keeping it RECOMMENDED.

Hmm. Well it's really there for registration not with servers but with 
services such as MUC and gateways. So in that sense it belongs in 
something other than the Basic level.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070321/c85a5761/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list