[Standards] Link-Local Messaging comments
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Mar 22 05:47:16 UTC 2007
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Sjoerd Simons wrote:
>> Also in this case it would be good to annotate all TXT records in the
>> spec with
>> an indication of when they were first introduced and/or deprecated.
>> e.g. nick
>> is introduced in version 2, port.p2pj is deprecated since version 1
> Yes I will do that.
If we don't use txtvers then it's unnecessary. But it would be helpful
to better define the status of each TXT record. Here's what I would say:
txtvers (hardcoded to "1")
What do you think?
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards