[Standards] certification etc.

Boyd Fletcher boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Thu Mar 22 14:08:14 UTC 2007


then let¹s make it required for the intermediate suite. its certainly much
more of a user facing service that non-SASL S2S is.

boyd



On 3/20/07 8:57 PM, "Matthias Wimmer" <m at tthias.eu> wrote:

> Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 schrieb:
>> > Unless you are running over low bandwidth communications like SATCOM or
>> > Cellular Modems. We use lots of high latency low b/w communications links.
>> > TLS does not work well in those environments which is why we use straight
>> > ZLIB and are looking at supporting efficient XML.
> 
> Sure there are valid applications for XEP stream compression.
> 
> But I don't think that just because something as an application does not
> need that it gets added to the basic IM suite. IMO there should be only
> the smallest set of protocols we think they have to be supported in any
> case. If we add to many protocols to the basic IM suite it will result,
> the importance of this list gets lost.
> 
> I'd propose that on the basic IM suite we add the protocol we consider
> to be a must of any implementation. On the intermediate IM suite we
> should add the protocols we consider to be a should implement.
> 
> 
> Matthias
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070322/fe935e6d/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list