[Standards] pubsub/pep auto-creation

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Mar 22 16:47:51 UTC 2007

Ian Paterson wrote:
> Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> The convincing argument [for publish+configure] should be the fact that
>> [without it] you can never assume on a publish that you are publishing an
>> item the way you want it, unless you check configuration. And even
>> checking doesn't guarantee you that your item will be published privately
>> if some other resource is posting public events to it.
> Yes, this argument seems very convincing.
> +1 publish+configure for PEP

But as I just mentioned in the jdev room, publish+configure doesn't give 
you per-item ACLs, it gives you publish plus (perhaps) toggle the node 
configuration, which is quite different.

I think we need a MUC meeting about this. :)


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070322/6d621bad/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list