[Standards] HTTPS Trasport for Jingle

Thiago Camargo thiago at jivesoftware.com
Fri Mar 23 02:08:25 UTC 2007


Sean,

I heard, some guys are using HTTP tunnels to transport Jingle when NAT blocks non HTTP traffic. And then we can you http Proxies as a last resort.
So, which one is better for this case HTTP or HTTPS?

Regards,
Thiago

-----Original Message-----
From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Sean Egan
Sent: quinta-feira, 22 de março de 2007 18:52
To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Standards] HTTPS Trasport for Jingle

On 3/22/07, Thiago Camargo <thiago at jivesoftware.com> wrote:
> What's the real advantage of using HTTPS transport for Jingle instead of
> using just HTTP ?
> Yes the voice is encrypted, but I'm wanting to know extra reasons.
> Anyone knows the real reasons?

What HTTPS Transport?



More information about the Standards mailing list