[Standards] negative presence

Matt Tucker matt at jivesoftware.com
Fri Mar 23 23:17:04 UTC 2007


Thanks for the bug report. I filed this as http://www.igniterealtime.org/issues/browse/JM-1009.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org 
> [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Melo
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
> Subject: [Standards] negative presence
> Hi,
> I wonder if anybody has an idea about support for negative 
> presences in the servers all around. I´ve tested with 
> wildfire and ejabberd.  
> Wildfire forwards messages without a resource to a negative 
> priority resource (I'm reporting this as a bug), ejabberd 
> does not. Anybody tested with other servers?
> I'm also worried about clients. What would be the proper way 
> for a client to deal with a negative presence? right now I 
> think that he should not show the person as online, nor 
> should he allow any chat messages to be sent directly to the 
> resource. After all, I interpret negative priority as a "no 
> chat" indication, right?
> The reason I'm asking is that we are starting to test agents, 
> small task-oriented applications that work over XMPP to 
> accomplish a simple task. They use the same JID as my main 
> account. Think about an assistant, that receives meeting 
> requests, checks you calendar and accepts or denies the 
> request based on user defined criteria. Or a content 
> management system that synchronizes all his content to all 
> the elements of the team via XMPP.
> Thanks in advance,
> --
> Pedro Melo
> Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
> Jabber ID: melo at simplicidade.org
> Use Jabber!

More information about the Standards mailing list