[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: STUN ServerDiscovery forJingle
matt at jivesoftware.com
Sun Mar 25 14:43:55 UTC 2007
I didn't propose a public TURN server. Yes, that would be a crazy idea.
:) STUN is a somewhat special case because it requires two public IP
addresses from the server. Openfire can now act as a STUN server, but
the two IP address requirement makes that a bit of a setup burden.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org
> [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Evgeniy Khramtsov
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 1:47 AM
> To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: STUN
> ServerDiscovery forJingle
> Matt Tucker wrotes:
> > * Should we run a public STUN server at xmpp.org
> I think this is not a good idea :) While there are no
> security problems with Binding requests, publically available
> TURN servers can be used by non-xmpp software as anonymous proxies.
More information about the Standards