[Standards] Re: Feedback on I/O Object Forms

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Mar 27 02:14:04 UTC 2007


Alexander Gnauck wrote:
> Alexander Gnauck schrieb:
>> my understanding of the XEP is that they also want to route existing 
>> XML data structures without converting them back and forth to/from xdata.
>> They also have some complex data structures which will not fit into 
>> xdata forms. I think it would be easier if there is a real world 
>> example which we can understand without having a diploma in medicine 
>> or biology.
> 
> i think also Object Forms is a confusing name for this XEP.
> The authors work here more with very complex Objects which are not 
> 'flat' like x-data forms.

Agreed.

I also agree with Alex that it would be good for this spec to include 
more examples, especially examples from a domain other than bioinformatics.

Remember, we put the example in example.com :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070326/e9008f09/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list