[Standards] pubsub/pep auto-creation
ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Tue Mar 27 02:50:47 UTC 2007
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Ian Paterson wrote:
>> We should make user interfaces as easy as possible - even if they are
>> rarely used. The flow you describe forces the user to provide input
>> in a second dialog that they probably weren't expecting to pop-up on
>> their screen after the round trip to the server.
> Hmm. Does it? Why can't the client eat the error flow and handle it
> seamlessly from the user perspective?
Well here we've not been talking about a node that doesn't exist, so
there would be no error. But, Rachel raised a very similar point here on
Friday. Here's my response to her:
Ian Paterson wrote:
> I agree it is possible, but as I pointed out in the previous post
> not only is it sub-optimal, it is vulnerable to race conditions.
> Although errors would typically be very rare in practice, IMHO, the
> existance of the vulnerability alone makes it hard to justify the
> "check-config-and-replace-if-necessary" approach when implementing
> this user interface.
More information about the Standards