[Standards] certification etc.

Boyd Fletcher boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Tue Mar 27 16:15:38 UTC 2007

so does anyone have an objection with making stream compression required for
the intermediate suite?

On 3/26/07 6:18 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:

> Ralph Meijer wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 18:25 -0400, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL
>> J9935 wrote:
>>> I think stream compression should be required for the immediate suite and
>>> File Transfer should be moved to an  advanced or a media suite.  Many
>>> corporate and government folks have serious issues with allowing file
>>> transfer over their collaboration systems because its hard to ensure that
>>> the files being transferred have been properly scanned for malicious content
>>> like viruses, trojans, worms, etc...
>> That products are certified to a certain suite doesn't mean that
>> deployments should enable/allow certain features...
> Right.
> Compliance, certification, and the requirement levels in our protocol
> specs are all about what gets implemented in software. How the software
> is deployed is a matter of local service policy.
> Peter

More information about the Standards mailing list