[Standards] Re: Feedback on I/O Object Forms

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Mar 27 19:55:52 UTC 2007


aliban at gmx.net wrote:

> Don't worry, we will generalize the examples.

Great!

> The XEP will describe a generalized way to (1) discover and (2) execute 
> a remote function in a way similar to the principles of SOAP based Web 
> Services. As a special feature it will also describe a way for the 
> server side (the Web Service) to (3) notify the client about completion 
> of the job. In contrast to current http SOAP based Web Services the 
> server side (the Web Service) can actively push data (the notification 
> about completion or error) to the client. In addition to that it 
> describes a way for the client to (4) keep track of the job and the 
> possibility to (5) stop/cancel a currently executing job.

Super. Because you guys are updating the proposal, I'll remove it from 
tomorrow's XMPP Council meeting agenda.

> As Alex said, a flexible "Web Service over XMPP" requires a not 'flat' 
> data object.

Right.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070327/0956239d/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list