[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: STUN Server Discovery forJingle

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Mar 27 22:08:39 UTC 2007

Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
> Matt Tucker wrotes:
>> * Should we run a public STUN server at xmpp.org
> I think this is not a good idea :) While there are no security problems 
> with Binding requests, publically available TURN servers can be used by 
> non-xmpp software as anonymous proxies.

I was contacted a while back by someone who runs a public STUN server 
about taking over their server and hosting it on our machines. If the 
bandwidth requirements are not excessive I would consider it. Especially 
once we get rid of jabberstudio.org. :)


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070327/3888b878/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list