[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Metacontacts
melo at simplicidade.org
Thu Mar 29 15:17:38 UTC 2007
On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Mridul wrote:
> I am not very sure if we have to adapt everything to PEP (which
> seems to
> be the direction most specs are taking nowadays).
> Keeping simple things simple really helps, and since xep 49 already
> exists, why do we want to invent private settings on top of pep ?
Because it makes it trivial to keep several resources in sync.
Something that is not possible with xep 49, given that it lacks
> It is like using muc for 1 to 1 chat.
No it's not :)
But I like that analogy. Question: would it work using MUC for chat?
So what is the problem of using a protocol for other things than
those the original authors had in mind?
Jabber ID: melo at simplicidade.org
More information about the Standards