[Standards] certification etc.

Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 Boyd.Fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Thu Mar 29 17:18:04 UTC 2007

I'm not fond of "recommended" standards so I would vote for just required in
Immediate Server 2008. But make it required for C2S and S2S connections.


On 3/28/07 9:17 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:

> Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 wrote:
>> as long as the servers are required to have stream compression (for
>> C2S an S2S connections) then i suppose that is good enough.
> It feels to me like it would either be recommended in "XMPP Basic Server
> 2008" or required in "XMPP Intermediate Server 2008".
> And naturally if we're going to require support for XEP-0138, we also
> need to specify which compression methods from the registry will be
> mandatory-to-implement. IMHO zlib is a good baseline since it is a
> mature technology. The "Efficient XML" spec still needs to be published
> (I don't see it at the W3C site yet) and then implemented, so it might
> be appropriate for certification in 2009 or 2010.
>> btw, you can read more on Efficient XML at
>> http://www.agiledelta.com/w3c_binary_xml_proposal.html
> http://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/ may be more appropriate.
>> its really quite good which is why the w3.org chose it.
> Well there's a non-sequitur. :)
> /psa

More information about the Standards mailing list