[Standards] certification etc.
boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Thu Mar 29 17:35:06 UTC 2007
We actually implement servers in those environments as well. We are putting
them in the backs of ruggedized SUVs and aboard ship and they connect to
other servers and clients via high frequency radio links or SATCOM. stream
compression for S2S is just as important to use as C2S.
But we also work with people who are installing servers in austere
non-mobile locations (like villages and towns in africa and asia) for more
efficient local communications similar to how their email servers are local
but can connect globally. using s2s with stream compression to communicate
externally resulted in a noticeable reduction in network b/w utilization.
On 3/29/07 10:07 AM, "Matthias Wimmer" <m at tthias.eu> wrote:
> Hi Boyd!
> Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 schrieb:
>> > as long as the servers are required to have stream compression (for C2S an
>> S2S connections) then i suppose that is good enough.
> I understand, that there are restrictions on some environments where you
> will implement clients. So you cannot use TLS compression and might want
> to use stream compression.
> But I don't think you implement servers on that restricted environments.
> So I don't think it should get recommended or even required for s2s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards