[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Metacontacts
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Mar 30 15:21:11 UTC 2007
Ian Paterson wrote:
> I think XEP authors will leverage
> PEP much more than they have employed iq:private. Personally I feel the
> existance of a node registry helps encourage that. IIRC there is no one
> place where you can discover which iq:private namespaces have been
> reserved. That has left us all with the (incorrect?) feeling that
> iq:private is intended mainly for proprietary use (as you pointed out).
I'll put conversion of the existing disco-nodes registry to a more
general nodes registry (disco + pubsub) on the agenda for the next
meeting of the XMPP Council.
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards