[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Metacontacts

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Mar 30 15:21:11 UTC 2007

Ian Paterson wrote:
> I think XEP authors will leverage 
> PEP much more than they have employed iq:private. Personally I feel the 
> existance of a node registry helps encourage that. IIRC there is no one 
> place where you can discover which iq:private namespaces have been 
> reserved. That has left us all with the (incorrect?) feeling that 
> iq:private is intended mainly for proprietary use (as you pointed out).

I'll put conversion of the existing disco-nodes registry to a more 
general nodes registry (disco + pubsub) on the agenda for the next 
meeting of the XMPP Council.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070330/a416bed7/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list