[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Sat May 5 20:47:18 UTC 2007
On 5 May 2007, at 00:43, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935
> if the intermediate client spec requires XEP-45 then shouldn't we
> have an
> intermediate server spec that does?
MUC isn't a server requirement, it's a component.
> also if we are recommending XEP-78 then it might be a good idea to
> add it
> back to the list of extensions though I am curious why we would
> want to
> recommend a deprecated XEP.
It's nice for testing, and it's nice for the (many) clients out there
which require it to connect still. It's only a recommended, and this
won't be a long-term entry to the compliancy suites.
Psi XMPP Client Project Leader (http://psi-im.org)
More information about the Standards