[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon May 7 18:54:26 UTC 2007


Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 wrote:
> Perhaps that is too strict of a definition of a server. Users don't
> care how muc is implemented just so long as their "xmpp server"
> supports it. So if you look at server more as an entity not as a
> single piece of software then it makes sense to mandate muc for
> intermediate server especially  since intermediate client requires
> muc.

Implementation is different from deployment. Compliance levels are for 
software implementations, not service deployments.

Peter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070507/e0a61e60/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list