[Standards] updated STUN discovery proposal

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon May 7 20:51:47 UTC 2007

Unnikrishnan V wrote:
> There are more protocols than stun and stun-relay to help  us to solve 
> the NAT traversal issue ( RSIP,UPNP ).
> do we need to add XMPP server to address this space also or do we 
> concentrate on the
> im/voip space more and intagrate well with these specialists to solve 
> the nat traversal issue.
> its  choice time :-)

You're right, we probably need a more generic approach. I'll post about 
that in a few minutes.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070507/63031d80/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list