[Standards] SUMMARY: compliance levels

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu May 10 18:14:29 UTC 2007

Boyd Fletcher wrote:

> I like the idea in the other emails about reduce functionality for
> intermediate client however, I think most of the major XMPP clients and all
> the XMPP servers are nearly 100% MUC compliant so does it really make much
> difference?

In my experience, very few clients do all the room management stuff. 
I've seen that only in Psi and JBother. And the telnet client, of 
course! ;-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070510/3961081e/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list