[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008

Rachel Blackman rcb at ceruleanstudios.com
Thu May 10 19:45:34 UTC 2007

> One point against having MUC as a requirement is that MUC can be
> federated out. users on hawkesnest.net can access MUC at
> conference.jabber.org. So the implemented services of hawkesnest.net
> arguably include MUC, regardless of whether it's a part of that  
> server.
>   This is distinct from a mere plugin like starttls.
> This is exactly the reason why it makes sense to have MUC as a  
> client feature and not as a server.  Just because your server  
> doesn't support MUC doesn't mean that you can't use  
> conference.jabber.org or any other MUC service.

Exactly.  Which is, I think, what we were originally pushing for  
anyway, right?

Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillianastra.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070510/445105e3/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list