[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008
rcb at ceruleanstudios.com
Thu May 10 19:45:34 UTC 2007
> One point against having MUC as a requirement is that MUC can be
> federated out. users on hawkesnest.net can access MUC at
> conference.jabber.org. So the implemented services of hawkesnest.net
> arguably include MUC, regardless of whether it's a part of that
> This is distinct from a mere plugin like starttls.
> This is exactly the reason why it makes sense to have MUC as a
> client feature and not as a server. Just because your server
> doesn't support MUC doesn't mean that you can't use
> conference.jabber.org or any other MUC service.
Exactly. Which is, I think, what we were originally pushing for
Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillianastra.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards