[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon May 14 17:41:15 UTC 2007

Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Boyd Fletcher wrote:
>>>> maybe I’m missing something but I haven’t seen a written 
>>>> Intermediate Server 2008 spec.
>>> Maybe that's because it hasn't been written yet.
>>> I'll write a rough draft of that spec and update the other specs 
>>> before the next Council meeting (May 16).
>> http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/int-server-2008.html
> Why is component protocol required ?
> I thought it was historical and informational ...

Would it help to change it to Standards Track? There has been talk about 
working on a new component protocol but the existing one is very widely 
implemented and deployed, and is the only standard way to connect 
external components to servers.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070514/20a1916a/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list