component protocol (was: Re: [Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon May 14 19:22:54 UTC 2007


JD Conley wrote:
> I agree that Component protocol should not be included in the suite. The
> method used to connect components is going to vary greatly depending on
> implementation. This gets especially weird when you start federating
> services in combination with load balancing, clustering, guaranteed
> delivery/queuing, etc. 

Feel free to map out some ideas here:

http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/XMPPComponentProtocol

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070514/a4478d33/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list