[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008

Philipp Hancke fippo at goodadvice.pages.de
Mon May 14 19:33:27 UTC 2007

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> It is used, true - but is there any reason why a intermediate 
>> compliant server should support it ?
>> For example, pubsub/muc/jud/something_else could be implemented within 
>> the server without requiring external components.
> I see your point. Let's say MUC is required. How you implement it in 
> your server codebase is up to you. If you don't support MUC internally, 
> you'll need to support it via external component. 

or via S2S? :-)

I think a "conference server 2008" would make much more sense than
requiring MUC for a server.


More information about the Standards mailing list