[Standards] Question about MUC invites

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue May 15 17:29:43 UTC 2007

Rachel Blackman wrote:
> On May 15, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> I don't understand why a bare JID is needed here, a full JID would be 
>>> better.
>> We probably thought it would be a presence leak. If you are not in my 
>> roster, the room is semi-anonymous, and I send you an invitation, then 
>> now you know my full JID.
>> I'm not saying I'm opposed to changing it, just thinking through the 
>> reasoning.
> To play devil's advocate here... arguably, if we're not in each other's 
> rosters, and I desperately want to conceal my presence data from you, I 
> have no business inviting you to a MUC room in the first place.  Doing 
> so reveals I'm online, which is in my experience the main 'presence 
> leak' people want to avoid. ;)

Good point.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070515/74ace900/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list