[Standards] Question about MUC invites
stpeter at jabber.org
Tue May 15 18:23:58 UTC 2007
Rachel Blackman wrote:
>>> To play devil's advocate here... arguably, if we're not in each
>>> other's rosters, and I desperately want to conceal my presence data
>>> from you, I have
>>> no business inviting you to a MUC room in the first place. Doing so
>>> reveals I'm online, which is in my experience the main 'presence
>>> leak' people want to avoid. ;)
>> But its an intentional leak on the part of the invitor that doesn't
>> persist once the invitor has left the MUC room. I'm not sure that it
>> counts as an ongoing presence leak.
> Sure, but I fail to see why including the resource is really a more
> egregious presence leak than using the bare JID.
Agreed. I think it's a spec bug. Will fix in the next version unless
there are stenuous objections.
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards