[Standards] Question about MUC invites

Grégoire Menuel gregoire.menuel at gmail.com
Tue May 15 19:26:52 UTC 2007

Le mardi 15 mai 2007, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
> Rachel Blackman wrote:
> >>> To play devil's advocate here... arguably, if we're not in each
> >>> other's rosters, and I desperately want to conceal my presence data
> >>> from you, I have
> >>> no business inviting you to a MUC room in the first place.  Doing so
> >>> reveals I'm online, which is in my experience the main 'presence
> >>> leak' people want to avoid. ;)
> >>
> >> But its an intentional leak on the part of the invitor that doesn't
> >> persist once the invitor has left the MUC room.  I'm not sure that it
> >> counts as an ongoing presence leak.
> >
> > Sure, but I fail to see why including the resource is really a more
> > egregious presence leak than using the bare JID.
> Agreed. I think it's a spec bug. Will fix in the next version unless
> there are stenuous objections.

Fine with me :)

I will change mu-conference accordingly.

Grégoire Menuel
xmpp:omega at im.apinc.org
GPG: 1024D/D3BF3B20

More information about the Standards mailing list