[Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008
stpeter at jabber.org
Tue May 29 22:45:18 UTC 2007
Alex Mauer wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Alex Mauer wrote:
>>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> Not every server deployment is connected to the Internet.
>>> No, but every server implementation could be.
>> I rather doubt that the folks running the SIPRNET would agree. At least
>> not in any operational sense of the word "could".
> What, did the folks running the SIPRNet write their own XMPP server that
> only works on the SIPRNet? Isn't part of the point of SIPRNet to use
> standard protocols on a secure network? Couldn't any implementation
> (not deployment) that can be connected to SIPRNet also be connected to
> the Internet, and so support MU-C via s2s?
Technologically it could, but politically it could not (AFAIK).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards