[Standards] XEP-0115: version 1.5 revisited
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Nov 8 23:24:41 UTC 2007
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> How exactly do 1.3 clients break if in 1.4+ the nodes are things like:
>> Again it's a special URL at the software website. The only potential
>> problem is the inclusion of the '#' character, but we can change it (as
>> we did before) to be ';' instead of '#'. In fact I think we should do
>> that for backward compatibility.
> As I think about this a little more, it's annoying that the URI changes
> with each version. 1.3 clients that are using the URI to (for example)
> select an icon based on the client software would have to be updated
> every time the sending software has a new version, since they treat the
> URI as a more-or-less opaque identifier.
> If we think the version number is still interesting, perhaps we should
> just define a new attribute that 1.4+ clients could look at if they want
You mean like this:
Or it could be split out as a separate attribute.
Where the v attribute SHOULD be included.
Yes it seems a bit funny to have a 'v' attribute:
But we're keeping 'ver' for backward-compatibility so it seems OK:
Deja vu all over again. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards