[Standards] XEP-136 and XEP-59 implementation comments
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Nov 14 16:17:54 UTC 2007
Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 novembre 2007, Alexander Tsvyashchenko a écrit :
>> File format
>> From my experience it seems that limiting one file to conversation with
>> just one JID is too restrictive - dealing with one single file for all JIDs
>> is much more convenient in many cases than with a bunch of files.
> I think file format is implementation detail, and should NOT be part of that
> XEP at all.
> That section should be removed.
> Maybe it can be part of a separate XEP later (there are already other im log
> specification elsewhere anyway) or extention to XEP-0227, but it's not
> really related
Typically we specify only wire protocols, not file formats for local
storage. I don't have deep objections to defining such formats, but in
this case I agree that the file format should be defined in a separate
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards