[Standards] XEP-0115: version 1.5 revisited

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Nov 21 18:09:35 UTC 2007


Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> 
> On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Rachel Blackman wrote:
> 
>> I.e., I think this method is kind of a mess, when just adding 'hash'
>> in separately would've solved the backwards compatibility issue
>> nicely.  However, that ship has probably sailed, so even just
>> including 'v' will solve the 'users will ask for this' concern I had
>> about displaying version strings. :)
> 
> 
> And then new clients would need to respond to both new-style queries and
> old-style queries, as well as continuing to send ext for
> backward-compatibility.
> 
> I agree that it's unfortunate that old clients will show the hash as the
> version number.  Like stpeter said, though, I'm not convinced that the
> version number has general-purpose utility.

I'm not either, but if 'v' is optional and end users love it then I have
no objections.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071121/9e06d911/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list