[Standards] XEP-0115: version 1.5 revisited

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Nov 21 18:26:36 UTC 2007

Well, whatever it is, we should specify it. :)

Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> I disagree with this.  I think it should return not found.  Think about
> a pub-sub service, for example...
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I don't think I agree. That is, I think if you receive a disco#info
>> request at a node you don't know about, you should reply as if the node
>> attribute had not been included. But I notice that this is not specified
>> in XEP-0030.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20071121/bb0dc6de/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list