[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Requirements for IM File Transfer

Unnikrishnan V ukv1977 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 16 16:36:57 UTC 2007


 thinking loud, It may be better to increase the message types and making
use cases and rules around it for rest all needs.

ex: is i can call somebody and the other person can respond with a text
message or add voice to a shared whiteboard session or share my notes  in a
voice session

thanx
unni



On 9/14/07, Kevin Smith <kevin at kismith.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 14 Sep 2007, at 21:59, Unnikrishnan V wrote:
> > The shared white board and file transfer thread looks to me like
> > we need a more generic  session protocol which is capable of doing
> >
> > 1) Whiteboard
> > 2) File transfer
> > 3) Voice/ Video
> > 4) chat and MUC
> >
> >
> > mostly based on the <message> than <iq> ( it looks the core
> > requirement is to  "work with with the message session"  )  and
> > able to accommodate new services comes up.
>
> Isn't that XMPP?
>
> /K
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070916/d0684bc1/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list